Author Archive

http://www.flickr.com/photos/debspace/3766841512/

retweet shirt

debh2u / Flickr

When I look back at all of the posts I have written recently, across various blogging sites (including this one), one theme is clear – I love to hate on Twitter. Here I’m at it again with reaction to Project Retweet – a half baked attempt at turning an already flawed process into standard functionality in Twitter’s UI.

Lets get one thing out of the way from the outset. Just because I think retweets (much like hashtags) are more or less workarounds for the failings of Twitter as a communication tool, that doesn’t mean they aren’t effective. One of my most popular posts on Examiner, the 5 reasons Facebook is better for marketing than Twitter, benefited greatly from retweeting. In an evening, the viral spread of the link to that post, almost entirely through RT’s amassed me over 1,000 views. Not bad when you think about it, really.

But the reason retweets came into existence in the first place was because Twitter users got frustrated with not being able to share the tweets they found with their friends. Unlike Facebook, favorites are buried on Twitter. You could look at a users “favorited” tweets but let’s face it, no one does.

Again, same thing with hashtags. People started to use the hash symbol in conjunction with keywords or abbreviations (#sxsw for example denotes South by South West) in order to provide a more efficient way of searching for related conversion on Twitter.

There have even been businesses form around the concept of retweets. TweetMeme and ReTweet.com are just 2 services which track the most popular conversations on Twitter based upon the number of RTs they get. You can even get into the act by clicking on the retweet button accompanying each post on this site.

Project Retweet

Project Retweet

Project Retweet was announced today Twitter as an official way to deal with retweeting. Essentially, the ability to re-tweet a tweet on your timeline will be included in the standard Twitter web UI as well as through API calls that third party developers can take advantage of.

Mashable wrote a great post about how these changes will affect what people have come to know about retweeting. Now, it will be possible to see messages from people you don’t follow in your twitter feed – something I am not looking forward to as I have recently pruned about 800 people from my followed list.

I feel for the company’s which developed their own tools to facilitate this non-standard way of sharing tweets. However, I really feel bad for Twitter in that they feel forced to engineer hack workarounds to obvious flaws in their product. These do not feel like well though out changes.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Stone Tablets

Other popular tablets

Loci Lenar / Flickr

In a few short weeks we’ll know if the talk about Apple releasing a brand new tablet computer is legit or not. While it has been speculated for years, the talk of this current incarnation – an oversized iPod touch with a 10 inch screen has gotten just about every analyst talking.

At this point though, I am not sure if I really need it.

Notice, I didn’t say I am not sure if I really want an Apple tablet. Of course I want one. But having an iPhone and a Mac Book Pro already in my laptop bag, what value could I possibly get from a tablet computer (and don’t say that I’d just look really cool because I am cool anyway, of course).

Some of the fake prototypes of the device that have surfaced leave more questions than answers. For example, how comfortable would it be to type on a glass screen? How would you even hold an oversized iPod touch device? Would you sit it flat on your lap? Well, that doesn’t seem like it would be that comfortable.

I am an Apple fanboy, that is for certain. I’m tempted by every new product they introduce, but this one just doesn’t seem to make a lot of sense for them. And, I wonder about the alleged $700 price tag. Surely they could command a larger price when you can’t even get a 32gb iPod touch for less than $400 and that has a 3 inch screen and no camera.

Would you buy an Apple tablet?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

AZIMA logo

Just got back from a great event tonight, hosted by the Arizona Interactive Marketing Association (AZIMA). The subject was one near and dear to my heart, that being Facebook. Three members of the Facebook team sponsored the event, and while the people that they sent were from the sales and marketing team, I have to say I got a lot out of their presentation.

First, I really admire and honestly, envy, the team that got to come and speak. It must be really awesome to go around the country and speak to large ballrooms full of Internet marketers about Facebook. The site is a enormous success, is growing by hundreds of thousands of users a week, and is worth several billion dollars. If you have read any of my writings about Facebook, you know I am an enormous fan of the site.

Second, these guys really know how to put together a presentation. Their slides were great, included some pretty damned impressive video snippets (high production value) and were full of useful information.

Third, attendees were provided links to some great, comprehensive documentation that talks about best practices for using Facebook for business marketing and advertising.

Much of the presentation focused on the basics of using Facebook for business marketing and I was hoping for a little more technical (specifically, Facebook Connect and customization of Facebook pages using FBML, etc) but this was a really good time.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Just an open letter to COX Communications in Phoenix, Arizona.

Dear COX Automated Robot Support Lady:

Thank you for saving me $50 this evening. Your inability to help me reset my Pay Per View pin number kept me from ordering UFC 100 using your COX inDemand service. Instead, I will probably just download the fight clips off illegal file sharing sites in the morning – more portable and in better quality than what I’d get by watching on my television.

When you said: “Just tell me what I can help you with” and I said “Reset Pay Per View Pin Number” I kind of expected you to, well, help me reset my PPV pin. But you didn’t. Maybe your masters didn’t program that, which is a shame, because after you replied to me with some sort of “I don’t understand” I asked to speak to an operator.

“Wait time is currently 10 minutes, please continue to hold”.

35 mins later, and I am still holding.

40 mins later and I decided to keep my money and write this blog post.

And what is the deal with these automated support numbers? Why do they ask me for a bunch of information, fail to have the answer to my question, then put me in touch with a human operator who has to go and ask me for all the same information over again? Why not just give me an option to talk to the robot or a human from the outset and save a lot of aggravation?

Here is how it could work:

“Hi, thanks for calling Cox support. You have the following options:

Press 1 if you would like to go through our automated support. Automated support can help you do A, B, and C.

Press 2 if you would like to just talk to a real person. This is a good option for X, Y, and Z.”

I know, because it costs more to have a real person respond. But how much does it cost you when I get tired of your support and go to Direct TV? Or, say, Dish Network. Or say hell with all of it and just run Hulu or my Apple TV for my shows.

Stop being so mediocre Cox.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Bird

Twitter bird

Paul Snelling / Flickr

 

Wow, so Twitter is a success but it needs to be completely rethought?

I know, I’m far from being the first person to criticize Twitter on a blog. However, I want to discuss an angle and offer a potential solution for reinventing Twitter into a tool which can be useful, monetized and ultimately, meet the needs of the people who use it every day.

The chat client that wasn’t

To begin, I will revisit the original intent behind Twitter, as stated time and time again by its founders.

Twitter, as a web site and service, was created to allow people to answer (and share their answer) to a very simple question: What are you doing? It was meant to be an evolution of the “status update” that instant messaging clients or social networking giants Facebook and MySpace popularized. It wasn’t, however, designed to BE an instant messaging or chat client. That is how Twitter has devolved (note: not “evolved”).

Now, I’m not saying that a chat client is a bad thing. Chat is actually a very good thing – I use chat all the time. Some of the best chat clients let me talk to people, on a real-time basis, organize my friends into lists and keep records of those conversations in a threaded view for review later.

Does Twitter do that?

The answer is kind of, but it needs a lot of help. Third party applications like Tweetdeck, or Tweetie attempt to organize a mess of followers into a pseudo list of contacts. Services like Twitter Search (formerly Summize) attempt to give you the ability to scan conversations for keywords. There are even bot applications that will answer tweets for you, greet new followers or send direct messages. But even with a thriving third party developer community and APIs, Twitter is a feeble chat client.

Try as they might, Twitter the “company” has failed to remedy the problem. They put limits on the number of followers one could have, and when the service gets overloaded (as recently as Michael Jackson’s passing just a few days ago) features on site get turned off so that the entire service doesn’t come crashing down.

Problems and solutions

Here is the biggest problem though in my opinion. I follow roughly 220 people, but 99.9% of them aren’t talking about something I care about when I read my Twitter feed. These folks may have said something at one point in time that interested me, which is why I started following them. However, as I sit here today, writing this post, I can tab over to my Tweetie window and find not a single conversation that I’m interested enough to engage in. Not even one.

bloxes in WSJ!
Image by Andrew Huff via Flickr

First and foremost, I think Twitter the “company” should shoot for making Twitter the “web site” into a chat portal. Now wait a minute, I just wrote 400 words describing why Twitter is a sucky chat client. That’s right — well, the reason is because it wasn’t created to be a chat client. But that’s how people use it, so it may as well move in that direction. Besides, how many monetization models are there for a status update site – none that I can think of.

People love to chat on Twitter, but as I pointed out, at any given time you may (but probably won’t) find people talking about something you care about. That’s why Twitter needs to move towards being more topic focused and less “follower” focused.

At the end of the day, does it really matter who has the most followers? Does it matter that I follow 220 people but almost never read what they have to say? Does it matter 923 people follow me, and do the people on the other end of MY tweets care about what I write? People care when its a topic of interest to them, and that’s where Twitter could potentially shine (and make some money).

It’s about the conversations stupid

Make Twitter about conversations and build on the things that Twitter does so well – mobile, extensibility and ease of use. Eliminate the follower/followed model and instead, create spaces for chatting on specific topics. Twitter search and trending topics are a great first step. Look at the Iran Election – hundreds of thousands of people all talking about a specific topic. Me? I didn’t care so much, so let me opt out of those messages – instead of flooding my feed with hundreds of messages on a subject I don’t want to read (my only option was to shut off Twitter or unfollow, which I did).

How about a system where you sign in, and opt yourself in to topics. Perhaps utilizing the existing Twitter framework you could specify keywords or create your own topic. From there on out, you will continue to receive on-topic tweets until you change your settings.

From a business standpoint, companies would be able to sponsor certain topics and invite people in to communicate. That’s really what businesses want anyway – people to opt in to messaging. Those companies would pay Twitter to have perhaps a permanent (or time limited), branded keyword topic on the site and Twitter would promote those conversations in much the same way they promote trending topics.

Regardless of how it might shake out, Twitter is going to need to embrace the chat model fully and modify their tools in order to make it a servicable application for talking online OR they need to fully embrace it being a status update system and get really creative about how they make money. Right now, Twitter is pretty much straddling both world’s and not doing an exceptional job at either.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]